A Design Process Explained

Three projects presented by Joshua Prince-Ramus of Rem Koolhaus' OMA.



A lengthy video but worth the time. The fundamental belief in the elegance of the diagram is inspiring.

Feasibility

From the British sketch comedy show SMACK THE PONY a critique. Is it feasible?



If this is what you think of the value of architects come let us change your minds.

More Parkour

Danish film maker Kaspar Astrup Schröder is currently finishing MY PLAYGROUND, a documentary on movement, tricking, freerunning and parkour, and its relation with urban spaces. The documentary will feature scenes with parkour masters Team Jiyo and interviews with urban planners, local politicians, architects and philosophers.

The trailer uses the Mountain Dwellings by BIG as a playground for the traceurs. The film is expected to be premiered in the summer of 2009.

Juliet House to be featured in Fine Homebuilding Magazine

I just spent a long, exhausting day helping Fine Homebuilding itinerant editor and photographer Chuck Miller document our Juliet House for the '08 Spring/Summer "HOMES" issue of the magazine. The house was one of almost 300 submitted for the issue, and one of only eight to be selected. While the work typically represented in the magazine favors a more traditional aesthetic, they are working to broaden that approach to include a wider range of houses that embody innovative and sustainable solutions to the challenges of creating great houses. We look forward to this issue hitting the news stands April 29 of next year.

Burning Things

We’ve been doing some research about the pros and cons of fireplaces and stoves and the fuel choices of wood vs. gas. It's an interesting discussion and I thought I would make our research available. I apologize for the link intensive nature of this post. I attempted to categorize and sort. Enjoy.

The following links lay out the choice between gas and wood. Interestingly the consensus seems to be that wood is more environmentally friendly if you are in a location where wood is abundant. Both are quite efficient if you buy the right product. The smallest stoves and fireplaces will effectively heat a space of approximately 1,000 square feet. An efficient wood stove can be filled with wood and last up to 8 hours without having to add more fuel. The big trick seems to be purchasing an EPA approved product. This will ensure that you get a product rated for efficiency that can be compared to other models.

Article from the Portland Tribune comparing the advantages of wood vs. gas

Is burning wood greener than burning gas?

Stoves vs. Fireplaces

The Case for Wood

The governments opinion

Well designed modern stoves and fireplaces are limited. There are many more European manufacturers making modern stoves that aren't available in the U.S. The Franklin stove aesthetic still rules America. Of the modern designs available, many seem to be designed to compete with TV's. Odd.

Here are a few manufacturers that make interesting products.

Wittus - New York

AustroFlamm - Great Name

Morso - Tennessee

Malm - Old School

We're being watched

Do you see faces in buildings? Something in how we're all wired. It's likely related to some desire not to be eaten. Just a theory.

Looks a little like a moray eel. I have some experience on the subject. Ask me about it sometime. Check more out here. They're everywhere.

Conspicuous Unsustainability

One of the greatest challenges for an architect today is how -- given the obvious and belated realization that we all need to reduce our carbon footprint -- to reconcile the fact that the most common result of our efforts to rearrange the world for our benefit is...a bunch more stuff. How is a designer to practice their craft without leaving a trail of "junk" (however innovative, however beautiful) in their wake. I've been contemplating how the skills of the designer might be re-conceptualized such that their projects somehow don't necessarily result in the unfortunate by-product of more stuff. That thought got me to thinking that such a concept of design requires a different kind of client as well - one who is seeking not so much more & better stuff, but rather a conceptual reorganization of their relationship to stuff, and ultimately a liberation from the tyranny of stuff. This article in the Atlantic is a thought provoking look at the psycho-social dimension of our ruinous addiction to stuff. This approach puts yet another spin on the old shibboleth "less is more". It raises the question for me - how do we as designers work for a world in which the ultimate status symbol is a freedom from stuff? We'd love to hear your thoughts on this.

2008 RAVE Awards

We are very proud to announce that RoehrSchmitt Architecture has been awarded two 2008 Residential Architects Vision and Excellence (RAVE) awards. The two homes selected were the Wall House for new residences less than 2,000 square feet and the Juliet House for remodel and additions over 800 square feet.

Wall House

Juliet House

The RAVE awards are awarded by the Minnesota American Institute of Architects and Mpls.St.Paul Magazine and are featured in the August 2008 issue of Mpls.St.Paul Magazine. Pick up a copy at your local newsstand or check out all of the winners here.

Typical Clients

A sample of what our typical clients are looking for these days:

A few things we want in the house...

1) This will be a gathering place for many people so we will need a minimum of a four-car (SUV) garage.
2) We would like a secret passage in the house. Preferably one that is accessed by moving a candle holder that causes a bookcase to swirl around.
3) We want a large portrait with eyes that slide away so we can stand behind it and spy on people.
4) A bell tower.
5) A bomb shelter.
6) Gold leaf - everywhere.
7) An elaborate fountain in the center of the house with peeing cherubs.

A Beautiful City

I recently discovered a great site with these beautiful 360 degree panoramic images. Enjoy.

Minnehaha Falls

Hennepin Avenue Bridge

Sunrise on the Stone Arch Bridge

Fireworks on the Stone Arch Bridge

Weisman Art Center

Minneapolis Public Library

May 16th Open House at RoehrSchmitt Architecture

Join us for an Open House at RoehrSchmitt Architecture Friday May 16th * Six to Midnight * 201 Sixth Street SE, Suite 210, Minneapolis, MN 55414 * 612.216.4191

Map to RoehrSchmitt Architecture

In Conjunction with the 2008 Art-A-Whirl Studio and Gallery Tour * Presenting an art installation by Minnesota and International Artist Todd Severson * Drinks, Food and Promotional Trinkets while they last!

"It's MDF" and other questions answered...

We had about a thousand people come through the Juliet House last weekend oohing and ahhing in mostly all the right places. It was great to be able to share our work with so many enthusiastic people...along with the handful of skeptical ones as well. Even those who might have been put off by the non-traditional exterior expression of the house were generally won over once they got inside and experienced the expansive and light-filled spaces. At that point most people generally got it. And if they could get beyond the idea of carrying groceries up the stairs (!), the advantages of having the main living spaces up on the second level became obvious. While our conversations with visitors were all quite varied, a couple questions seemed to pop up repeatedly -- the number one being: What is this floor? Generally followed up by: so...what do the neighbors think? We joked afterwards about having t-shirts made next time that said "MDF" on the front, and "some of them like it, and some of them don't" on the back. Most were content with a brief explanation of particle board used as a finish material, and a little peroration on how we feel the neighborhoods need to allow for change and innovation, and not be treated as precious dioramas from the nineteenth century. Most of the folks who were interested in looking at our house in the first place understood this and sympathized.

The other question that we heard repeatedly was whether we considered the house to be sustainable. Obviously something that's on many peoples' minds, and rightly so. Unfortunately it's a word that's very quickly been commodified and rendered almost meaningless by its appropriation by everyone for virtually everything that could be remotely construed as such. What does it even mean anymore? Michael Pollen defines it nicely in a recent article in the New York Times Magazine:

To call a practice or system unsustainable is not just to lodge an objection based on aesthetics, say, or fairness or some ideal of environmental rectitude. What it means is that the practice or process can’t go on indefinitely because it is destroying the very conditions on which it depends. (emphasis mine)

What I like about this definition is that it takes us back to the notion that sustainability is not about things or products but rather about a practice or process -- i.e. behavior rather than stuff. Sustainability is thus not so much about the stuff you surround yourself with but rather about a way of life. As such we believe that a "sustainable" house is therefore one that helps to make possible a certain way of life. You can incorporate all the latest trends in energy efficient devices and systems you want, but if you insist on living LARGE and taking up more than your fair share of space on this crowded planet then it doesn't matter how many Priuses you've got in your sprawling garage. And we generally take up way too much space and consume way too many resources already. A typical westerner uses something like 200 times the energy as a typical hunter/gatherer - which is what we all were until some 10,000 years ago. So each of us, as animals, consumes and produces the waste equivalent of an entire prehistoric village. That is clearly unsustainable. Especially given that the rest of the world aspires to and is very quickly catching us with our "western" standard of living. As such sustainability is fundamentally a question of reduction - and most likely rather extreme reduction - in how much we consume. So before we even get into specifics of systems and materials, we need to understand that most of sustainability is common sense: building just enough, with simple durable materials, in a place that requires as little travel as possible. It's not just consuming differently, but consuming less -- much less. That raises questions such as: what is a reasonably sized house for a family of 4? 2000 square feet? Perhaps 3000? By world standards a house this size is already a palatial. Clearly then anything much beyond that is extravagant and wasteful, and regardless of solar panels, a gray water retrieval system, and a couple hybrids in the garage, could not seriously be considered "sustainable." (to say nothing of this travesty!) A serious consideration of sustainability is going to require a complete re-evaluation of how we live, and how our entire economy and way of life is dependent upon incessant consumption. It will not be easy or painless, and the resulting world will look nothing like our current world - with solar panels on top.

So are we "sustainable" architects? We would like to think that helping people create dwellings that allow them to live more sustainably is not something separable from just being a good architect. And we're always trying to become better architects -- that never stops.